|
The book is a quick read, allowing the reader to form their own view and create their own image of what they belive the dodo once was. For example, some written accounts were taken from a boat that traveled by the island.the accountee not even stepping foot on the island. Furthermore, the recognizable paintings may or may not have been created from a live specimen, but a taxidermied version which may have been overstuffed. As past reviewers have mentioned, this book is visually stunning. I recommend merely as a collection of visual reference and general historical accounts. Fuller makes it very clear (time and time again) that everything we think we know about the dodo is based on written records or sketches. A very good entry level book to give a historical background on records, sketches, semi-factiods, and assumptions. Fuller also points out that we don't have complete facts on the legitimacy of any of the accounts.
Fuller's handsome, beautifully illustrated volume of all this dodo lore helps in the cause of dodo remembrance. In 1755, there was exactly one stuffed dodo. It is not as big or lush a volume as the one he produced on another goner, the great auk, but it is beautiful and fascinating. The dodo had no predators before encountering humans, so it had slipped into a flightless existence, and also did not flee when approached. Errol Fuller has told us just about everything there is to know about the bird in _Dodo: A Brief History_ (HarperCollins). They came from the small island of Mauritius in the Indian Ocean. the general public to take notice of the dodo, and the bird itself to enter the ranks of universal celebrity." In 1865, Lewis Carroll published _Alice's Adventures in Wonderland_, with an episode of the "caucus race" which the dodo decides "Everybody has won, and all must have prizes." Prizes, he also decides, have to come from Alice herself. "As dead as a dodo." Everyone knows the phrase (and it is far clearer than the obscure doornail variant).
They were actually large pigeons. They were easy prey. Of course they are depicted here.After more than a century of oblivion, Fuller explains that one simple event caused ". The head and right foot alone were saved, and "these pitiful fragments" still exist and have been used for DNA samples. They weighed more than fifty pounds, according to an observer from 1634. The dodo is universally acknowledged as a symbol of extinction, not just a dead bird, not just a dead species, but an emblem of wipeout. Although everyone knows the dodo, we know almost nothing about it. was suddenly in vogue and - again just like the book - it has never since been out of it." Dodo poems followed, and "Dodo" as a nickname for girls, dodos on teapots, tea towels, stamps, coffee mugs, advertisements, table service, and more.
It was within the Ashmolean Museum in Oxford. After the bird's extinction, no one much cared about it. We don't know what they ate, what they sounded like, or how they mated. We will never forget the dodo.
Fuller explains that the dodo, like the book, ". It is throughout good-humored, and in accord with its subject, it is peculiar, funny, and sad. Sir John Tenniel illustrated the episode, with his image based on first-hand depictions. It was discovered and wiped out long before the days of scientific observation.
It was in such a decrepit state that it was consigned to the flames. "But of one thing we can be sure," he writes, "There are now no dodos." Europeans arrived on Mauritius when the Dutch navy landed in 1598 (there had been transient visits by Portuguese and Arabs before then), and only fifty or so years later, there were no dodos. The facts about the birds are slim. They had ridiculously small wings that were a parody of flight.
The paintings of the Dodo are not discussed critically in terms of authorship and attribution or history. A lot more could have been said and done. Visually this book is stunning. But if you found a book about dinosaurs that said "we know almost nothing about them, except that there are no dinosaurs today" would you be interested. There is too much on dodo paraphanelia/souvnirs as well.It is in fact more disappointing than his other books on extinct birds like the Great Auk. In its attempt to be critical and parsimonious, it trips over itself in a mess of contradictions (was the Dodo grey or brown. For example that it may have shed the tip of its bill, that it produced chicks every 2 years or on any differences between males and females of a specific nature.
The author has very little conscious, critical or thought provoking to say. Fuller leaves us guessing if dodos lived on the interior of the island or coasts and whether it was a forest or shore type bird.In the end, the book is more like a log of evidence and we are left to pick out our own picture for ourselves.
The moral of the whole book is, "here are the facts but we don't really know and we can't either so there". The map of Mauritius does not clearly mark the spot where lots of dodo skeletons turned up and the general distribution of dodos.
Informative it is. We don't get to hear about where a few dodos were sent alive and how they contributed to paintings.
This book remains a vital reference on the Dodo with holes, unapologetic omissions and scientific coyness.Its price is good and it remains a reference - on the dodo, the Solitare and the mysterious "White dodo" though there isn't much of a story here. This is how Fuller starts his commentary on the dodo - "We know almost nothing." dodos equal famous dinosaurs.
- "it seems to have been greyish though Saftleven clearly shows the head was brown")and a script that reads like watery thin soup.The fact of the matter is, there is a lot of background interest in the Dodo and this book does not dare to speculate on various assumptions and models that have been made of the Dodo.
|
